Skip to main content

Corporate Governance

Management Approach
Download Documents
IRPC’s Corporate Governance PolicyDownload
IRPC CG HandbookDownload

Board Composition

The Board must consist of directors who possess the knowledge, skills, and experience aligned with IRPC’s business interests. They are expected to fully fulfill their duties fully in accordance with their responsibilities. To ensure this, IRPC has defined the composition of the Board, its key qualifications, and the tenure of its members as follows:

  • The Board consists of 5-15 directors.
  • Professional independent directors must constitute at least one-third of the Board or a minimum of three.
  • Directors may be up to 70 years of age.
  • A director can serve up to three successive terms (nine years).

The qualifications of an independent director comply with the criteria of the Thai Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including no involvement in management functions of the Company and subsidiary, no familial or legal relationship with another director, no business relationships, and not serving as an auditor of the company. In addition, IRPC’s criteria are more stringent than SEC regulations, requiring Independent Director to hold no more than 0.5% of all shares with voting rights of the Company, compared to the SEC’s limit of 1%.

For more information on Board structure, please visit [Board of Director]

Board’s Committees

The Board consists of four sub-committees, namely the Audit Committee, the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee, and the Risk Management Committee, each tasked with overseeing essential aspects of the company.

  • Corporate Governance and Sustainability Committee determines and monitors the organization’s annual performance, whether operational or strategic implementation, to ensure that IRPC conforms to the corporate governance and sustainability guidelines. The tasks include key aspects of corporate governance development, environmental governance, and social responsibility.
  • Audit Committee reviews the reliability of the financial statements from IRPC and subsidiaries, as well as the internal control system, internal audit system and risk management system to ensure their suitability and effectiveness. Moreover, the Committee provides recommendations on the improvement of the internal control system.
  • Nomination and Remuneration Committee recruits qualified candidates to nominate as Board members and the Chief Executive Officer based on the established criteria and procedures that ensures efficiency and transparency, so that the Board is made of directors with diverse knowledge, capability and qualifications. Moreover, the Committee considers compensation for directors and the Chief Executive Officer by adopting equitable and reasonable criteria.
  • Risk Management Committee is responsible for overseeing the organization’s risk management. Meanwhile, the Board sets the overall policy, and the Audit Committee review the compliance with these policies. Each committee conducts risk assessment, covering potential impacts to IRPC (both external and internal, including emerging risks, i.e. cybersecurity, environmental and social perspectives), and to provide risk management reports to the Audit Committee and Risk Management Committee for review.

Independent Directors

According to IRPC’s principles of good corporate governance, one-third of the Board of Directors shall consist of independent directors. Both directors and independent directors shall serve a term of three years. Independent directors who complete their term are eligible for reelection by shareholders; however, they may only serve up to three consecutive terms or nine years, with no exceptions. Independent directors must possess the expertise and qualifications for independence pursuant to notifications of the Capital Market Supervisory Board and stipulations of the Board of Directors.According to company policy, independent directors shall hold no more than 0.5 percent of IRPC’s issued shares, a requirement stricter than the 1 percent stipulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The definition of an IRPC independent director is provided in the Corporate Governance Handbook and the company website. Independent directors have the right to express their opinions at every meeting. They are expected to attend meetings regularly and have access to sufficient financial and business information, which enables them to express their thoughts freely and in the best interests of stakeholders. Additionally, they are tasked with preventing conflicts of interest between IRPC and executive officers, authorized directors, and majority shareholders.

IRPC has defined and compared the qualifications of Independent Directors, demonstrating their consistency and higher stringency compared to the requirements of the Stock Exchange Commission (SEC)’s and Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSI)’s criteria.

For more information related to Independent Directors, please refer to [RPC’s Statement on Independent Director]

Non–executive Chairman/Lead Director

To ensure effective corporate governance and avoid potential abuses of power, IRPC specifies that the Chairman of the Board and the President must be separate individuals. The primary role of the Chairman is to lead and provide guidance to the company’s Board of Directors, ensuring the highest standards of corporate governance within both the Board and the company, particularly in discussions on all proposals put forward by the management team.

The Chief Executive Officer and President and the Executives

The Board of Directors assigned the Chief Executive Officer and President, the highest-ranking executive of the management, to discharge of his duties in managing the company’s operations in accordance with the objectives, regulations and policies set by the Board.
More information on the criteria for nomination and selection of the President and Chief Executive Officer, please refer to [Criteria for Nomination, Selection, Qualifications and Remuneration The President and Chief Executive Officer]

Board Selection and Nomination Process

The appointment of the Board of Directors aligns with good corporate governance principles and the company’s Corporate Governance Policy. Director candidates are either nominated by shareholders or selected by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, responsible for screening qualifications and presenting suitable candidates for the Board’s consideration. The Board then presents the list of qualified candidates to shareholders for final approval. In cases of vacancies or resignations, the Board appoints new members based on recommendations from the Nomination and Remuneration Committee.

Nominees for director positions at IRPC are considered based on criteria such as their knowledge, experience, and abilities benefiting the company, as well as alignment with the Board’s skills matrix & diversities in terms of gender, age, race, nationality, expertise, skills & experience, knowledge, and abilities. The process also entails thorough checks on legal qualifications, regulatory compliance, and their demonstrated dedication to fulfilling directorial responsibilities.

For sub-committee appointments, consideration is given to the relevance of knowledge and competencies, tenure criteria, Board Skills Matrix/Diversities, and independent qualifications of directors, which are then brought before the Board of Directors for approval.

For more details on IRPC’s Board Selection and Nomination Process, please refer to the Director Selection & Nomination Process

Director Selection & Nomination ProcessDownload

Board Diversity Encouragement

IRPC supports an appropriate balance and diversity of skills, experience, race and gender within the Board of Directors and has implemented the Board Diversity Policy to ensure transparency of the appointment processes in compliance with Corporate Governance Policy. This aims to create a well-rounded leadership team with both the technical skills and experience needed for the energy industry, while also ensuring diversity in social background, race, gender, religions, and other aspects. The policy mandates the Nomination and Remuneration Committee to address Board vacancies by actively considering candidates who bring a diverse background and opinion from among those candidates with the appropriate background and industry or related expertise and experience as well as achieving an appropriate level of diversity.

Policy of Board Diversity in the Directors Nomination ProcessDownload
Diversity and Inclusion PolicyDownload

Board Industry Experience

According to IRPC’s Corporate Governance Handbook, the Board should comprise at least three directors with expertise in the petroleum and petrochemical industries, at least one with expertise in law, and at least one with expertise in accounting or finance. The following factors, as stipulated in the nomination policy and criteria, should be considered: educational background, management skills in their respective fields, and significant achievements and recognition within the comparable scale of business.

For more information on Board Industry Experience, please refer to Board Skill Matrix

Board Skill MatrixDownload

Board Effectiveness and Compensation

IRPC determines that the evaluation of Board performance, including assessments of the Board of Directors, subcommittees, and individual directors, is conducted annually to facilitate a comprehensive review of performance, challenges, and achievements throughout the preceding year. The performance assessment of the Board, as outlined in the Corporate Governance Handbook, is conducted in both forms of self-evaluation and cross-evaluation methods. Additionally, the performance assessment is evaluated by an external assessor every 3 years (Independent Assessment) and the results of such evaluation are to be reported to the Corporate Governance Committee, shareholders, and disclosed in the annual report. The assessment results are also utilized to drive further performance improvements. In addition, IRPC encourages our directors and executive officers to attend training programs that are beneficial to the performance of their duties, enabling them to enhance their skills, stay updated on industry trends, and effectively fulfill their responsibilities.

For more information on the process and results of the Board’s performance assessment, please refer to Corporate One Report

The Nomination and Remuneration Committee is responsible for reviewing Board compensation, providing recommendations to the Board for approval, and proposing the compensation amount at the annual general meeting for shareholder’s approval, ensuring transparency and adherence to the Compensation Best Practices released by the Thai Institute of Directors Association.Director compensation is linked to short- and long-term corporate strategies, ensuring compensation packages are appropriate commensurate to the size and complexity of IRPC’s business.

Corporate One ReportDownload

Success Metrics for the Chief Executive Officer and President Compensation

The Board of Directors has stipulated that the president of IRPC shall submit an annual performance report, which is assessed by the Nomination and Remuneration Committee. Subsequently, the Board utilizes the results of this review to determine the CEO and President’s remuneration. However, these assessment outcomes are treated as confidential information. The criteria for evaluation encompass challenging targets in accordance with the company’s short-term and long-term strategies, covering both monetary and non-monetary performances, including social, community, and environmental responsibilities. The CEO and President is responsible for managing the business and steering the organization forward, guided by two assessment indicators: corporate KPIs, accounting for 70% of the evaluation, and supporting factors that enhance the company’s transparency and sustainability, comprising the remaining 30%.

Corporate KPIs (70%)
Sustainable Growth Factors (30%)
  • Financial Perspective: EBITDA
  • Stakeholder Perspective: Stakeholder Satisfaction and Sustainability Pathway.
  • Internal Process Perspective: Operational excellence, refinery resilience implementation, %specialty product, strengthen project, new stream project
  • Learning & Growth Perspective: cyber security scorecard, talent development
  • Leadership
  • Board of Directors’ Assessment
  • Outstanding Management/Crisis Management

 

The adjustment of salary and annual bonuses for the CEO are dependent on the results of the performance review and are subject to the approval of the Board of Directors. In addition to challenging targets, these criteria comprehend key performance indicators of the company’s strategic plan and vision, corporate responsibilities for communities, society, and the environment, as well as a Balanced Scorecard. The remuneration of IRPC’s CEO and President is comparable to that of others within the same or similar industries.

Moreover, IRPC compares the company’s performance assessments with other companies in the same industry, particularly concerning financial indicators, to evaluate the CEO and President’s compensation relative to the organization’s financial performance. IRPC calculates our financial metrics and those of peers over a three-year period. This assessment compares the weighted average performance rank with the salary rank of IRPC’s CEO and president relative to peer company presidents. The comparison provides insights into IRPC’s relative financial performance.

For more information on the Corporate KPIDownload
Executive Level 1
Renumeration (Million Baht)
Compensation
Salary
Bonus
Other compensation
Provident fund contribution
Total
Compensation (THB)
2563
2564
2565
2565
Total annual compensation of the CEO
Median annual compensation of all employees, except the CEO
Mean annual compensation of all employees, except the CEO
Ratio between the total annual compensation of the CEO and the median employee compensation
Ratio between the total annual compensation of the CEO and the mean or employee compensation